PROGRAMI
DERS TANITIM VE UYGULAMA BİLGİLERİ

Ders AdıKoduVerildiği YılVerildiği YarıyılSüresi (T+U)Yerel KredisiAKTS Kredisi
Uluslararası YönetimMAN 6443 + 037,50
 
Ders Bilgileri
Dersin Öğretim DiliTürkçe
Dersin SeviyesiDoktora
Dersin TürüSeçmeli
Dersin Veriliş BiçimiYüz Yüze
 
Dersin Öğrenme Kazanımları:

Bu dersi başarı ile tamamlayan öğrenciler:
1. Küreselleşme olgusunu tartışır
2. Çok uluslu yönetim hakkında bilgi sahibi olur.
3. Uluslararası uygulamaların yerel bağlamlara transferi sürecini öğrenir.
4. Uluslararası uygulamaların hangi mekanizmalar aracılığı yerel bağlamlara yayıldığını anlar.
5. Küreselleşme ve kurumsal değişim konusunda bilgi sahibi olur.
6. Küreselleşmenin yerel bağlamlara etkisini tartışır.
7. Küreselleşmenin yakınsama ve ıraksama tartışmasına ilişkin kuramsal alt yapıyı öğrenir.
 
Dersin Önkoşulları ve Birlikte Alınması Gereken DerslerYok
Daha Önce Alınmış Olması Önerilen DerslerYok
 
Dersin Tanımı:

Çevresel faktörler bir ülkeden bir ülkeye farklılık arz ederler. Buna göre, bir ülkede iyi sonuç veren yönetim yaklaşımları başka bir ülkede başarılı olmayabilir. Bu nedenle kültürlerarası etkili bir yönetim göstermek isteyen yöneticiler kendi ülkelerindeki yönetim becerilerinden çok daha fazlasına ihtiyaç duyarlar. Bu dersin amacı küreselleşme olarak anılan süreçte ulus devlet temelinde örgütlerin nasıl etkilendiği ve nasıl tepki verdikleridir.
 
Dersin İçeriği (Haftalık Konu Dağılımı):
 
HaftaKonu
1Uluslararası yönetim süreci
2Küreselleşme Olgusu ve Kurumlar
3Küreselleşme ve Kurumsal Değişim
4Küreselleşme ve Ulusal Kurumsal Değişim Kuramları
5Küreselleşme, Kültür, Yerel Bağlam
6Küreselleşme ve Uluslararası Uygulamaların Yayılımı
7Küreselleşme Tartışmaları/Yakınsama ve Iraksama
8Küreselleşme_Merkez_Çevre Ülke
9Uluslararası Uygulamaların Yayılımında Yerel Aktörlerin Rolü
10Uluslararası Uygulamaların Yayılım Mekanizmaları_Kopyalama_Çeviri_Brikolaj
11Uluslararası Uygulamaların Gelişmekte olan Ülkelerde Yayılımı
12Küreselleşme ve Türkiye
13Liberalleşme
14Dönem Projesi Tartışması
 
Kaynaklar:
Held, David and McGrew Anthony, Küresel Dönüşümler, Büyük Küreselleşme Tartışması,
 
Diğer Kaynaklar:
Djelic, M. L. ve Quack, S. 2003. Globalizations and Institutions and Theoretical building blocks for a research agenda linking globalization and institutions, p. 1-15. In Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Campbel John, 2004. Instutional change and Globalization, Chapter one, Problem of Institutional Analysis, p. 1-31. Frenkel, M. ve Shenhav, Y. 2003. From Americanization To Colonization: The Diffusion of Productivity Models Revisted. Organization Studies, 24: 1537–1561. Goldberg, P. K. ve Pavcnik, N. 2007. Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries. Journal Economic Literature, XLV (March, 2007): 39– 82. Held, David and McGrew Anthony, Küresel Dönüşümler, Büyük Küreselleşme Tartışması, Kısım 2, p.155-164., p.164-178., p.257-269. Whitley, Richard. 2003. Changing transnational institutions and the management of international business transaction. p. 108-137. In Djelic, M. L. ve Quack, S (Eds). Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Campbel John,2004. Instutional change and Globalization, Chapter two, Problem of Change, p. 31-62. Delacroix, J. ve Ragin, C. 1978. Modernizing Institutions, Mobilization, and Third World Development: A Cross-National Study. The American Journal of Sociology, 84: 123–150. Held, David and McGrew Anthony, Küresel Dönüşümler, Büyük Küreselleşme Tartışması, Kısım 2, p.287-295., p.295-311., p. 311-320. Lilja, E. and Moen, Eli. 2003. Coordinating transnational competition: changing patterns in the European pulp and paper industry. p. 137-161. In Djelic, M. L. ve Quack, S (Eds). Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Campbel John,2004. Instutional change and Globalization, Chapter three, Problem of Mechanisms, p. 62-90. Fligstein, N. 1985. The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919-1979. American Sociological Review, 50: 377-91. Held, David and McGrew Anthony, Küresel Dönüşümler, Büyük Küreselleşme Tartışması, Kısım 2, p.320-330., 330-640, 340-358. Mittun et. al. 2003. Path-dependent national systems or European Convergence? The Case of European electricity markets. p. 161-193. In Djelic, M. L. ve Quack, S (Eds). Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Campbel John,2004. Instutional change and Globalization, Chapter four, Problem of Ideas, p. 90-124. Muiller, F. 1994. Societal Effect, Organizational Effect and Globalization. Organization Studies, 15: 407–428. Özen, Ş. ve Berkman, Ü. 2007. Cross-national Reconstruction of Managerial Practises: TQM in Turkey. Organization Studies, 28: 825–851. Nelson, R. E. ve Gopalan, S. 2003. Do Organizational Cultures Replicate National Cultures? Isomorphism, Rejection and Reciprocal Opposition in the Corporate Values of Three Countries. Organization Studies, 24: 1114–1151. Mok KH (2003) Globalisation and higher education restructuring in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. Higher Education Research and Development 22(2): 117–129. Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling : Concept Evolution and Theoretical Challenges. / Boxenbaum, Eva; Jonsson, Stefan. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism . ed. / Royston Greenwood; Christine Oliver; Thomas B. Lawrence; Renate E. Meyer. 2.ed. London : Sage Publications, Incorporated, 2017. p. 77-101. Carruthers, B.G and Halliday, T.C. 2006. Negotiating Globalization: Global Scripts and Intermediation in the Construction of Asian Insolvency Regimes, Law and Social Inquiry, Volume (31), Issue: 3,I 521-584. Campbel John,2004. Instutional change and Globalization, Chapter five, Problem of Globalization, p. 124-172. Acharya, A, 2004, How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism, International Organization 58, 239–75. Bennett, CJ, 1991, Review article: What is policy convergence and what causes it?, British Journal of Political Science 21, 2, 215–33. De Jong, M, 2013, China’s art of institutional bricolage: Selectiveness and gradualism in the policy transfer style of a nation, Policy and Society 32, 2, 89–101. Mukhtarov, F, 2014, Rethinking the travel of ideas: Policy translation in the water sector, Policy and Politics 42,1, 71–88. Dobbin, F, Simmons, B, Garrett, G, 2007, The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?, Annual Review of Sociology 33, 449–72. Pieterse, J. N. 1994. Globalization as hybridization. International Sociology, 9: 161–184. Vaira, M. 2004. Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 48: 483–510. Held, David and McGrew Anthony, Küresel Dönüşümler, Büyük Küreselleşme Tartışması, Kısım 4, p.396-412. 412-424.,424-437.454-477. Henizs, W. J. 2005. The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review, 70: 871–897. Levitt, T. 1983. The Globalization of Markets. Harvard Business Review, 61: 92-102. Öniş, Z. 1999. Political economy of Turkey in the 1980’s: Anatomy of unorthodox liberalism. Z. Öniş (Der.), State and market: The political economy of Turkey in comparative perspective: 183–196. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Press. Öniş, Z. 2000. The Turkish Economy at the Turn of a New Century: Critical and Comparative Perspectives. M. Abramowitz (Der.), Turkey's Transformation and American Policy. Washington D.C.: The Century Foundation Press. Held, David and McGrew Anthony, Küresel Dönüşümler, Büyük Küreselleşme Tartışması, Kısım 5. Campbel John, 2004. Instutional change and Globalization, Chapter six, Where do we go from here? p. 90-124. Bromley, P. 2011. Multiculturalism and Human Rights in Civic Education: The Case of British Columbia, Canada. Educational Research 53 (2): 151–164. Cassidy, C., Brunner, R., Webster, E. 2014. Teaching Human Rights? “All Hell Will Break Loose!” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 9 (1): 19–33. Wasti, Arzu ve Üsdiken Behlül, “Americanization vs. Contextualization at the Periphery: Scholarly Publishing in Management in Turkey, 1970-1999. Lee, 2009. Towards a Reformulation of Core/Periphery Relationships: A Critical Reappraisal of the Trimodality of the Capitalist World-Economy in the Early 21st Century Tanja A. Börzel & Julia Langbein (2019): Core–periphery disparities in Europe: is there a link between political and economic divergence?, West European Politics, DOI:10.1080/01402382.2018.1558534 Editor's introduction: Turkey's experience with neoliberal policies and globalization since 1980, Şevket Pamuk (a1), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600001679Published online: 05 March 2015. Selin Bengi Gümrükçü (2010) The Rise of a Social Movement: The Emergence of Anti-Globalization Movements in Turkey, Turkish Studies, 11:2, 163-180, DOI:10.1080/14683849.2010.483849. Ziya Önis (2011) Power, Interests and Coalitions: the political economy of mass privatisation in Turkey, Third World Quarterly, 32:4, 707-724, DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2011.567004. Ziya Önis (2006) Varieties and crises of neoliberal globalisation: Argentina, Turkey and the imf , Third World Quarterly, 27:2, 239-263, DOI: 10.1080/01436590500432366. Alford, H. ve Friedland, R. 1985. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Arias, M. E. ve Guillen, M. 1998. The Transfer of Organizational Tecniques Across Borders: Combining Neo-Institutional and Comparative Perpectives. J. L. Alvarez (Der.), Diffusion and consumption of Business Knowledge: 110–137. London: Macmillan Press. Czarniawska, B. ve Joerges, B. Travels of ideas. B. Czarniawska, ve G. Sevon (Der.), Translating organizational change: 13–18. Berlin: de Gruyter. Delacroix, J. ve Ragin, C. 1978. Modernizing Institutions, Mobilization, and Third World Development: A Cross-National Study. The American Journal of Sociology, 84: 123–150. Djelic, M. L. 1998. Exporting the American Model: The postwar transformation of European Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fligstein, N. 1985. The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919-1979. American Sociological Review, 50: 377-91. Fligstein, N. 1987. The Interorganizational Power Struggle: The Rise of Finance Personel to Top Leadership in Large Corporations, 1919- 1979. American Sociological Review, 52: 44-58. Friedland, R. ve Alford, R. R. 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. W.W. Powell ve P. J. DiMaggio (Der.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 232-263. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Standford, CA: Standford University Press. Gilpin, R. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Glynn, A.M. ve Lounsbury, M. 2005. From the Critics’ Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (5): 31–1056. Guillen, M. F. 1994. Models of management: Work authority, and organization in comparative perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Guillen, M. F. 2001. The Limits of Convergence and Organizational Change in Argentina, South Corea and Spain. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Gujarati, N. D. 1999. Hargadon, A. B. ve Douglas, Y. 2001. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 351–371. Hargrave, T. J. ve Van de Ven, A. H. 2006. A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31: 864–888. Held, D. ve McGrew, A. 2000. The Great Globalization Debate: An Introduction. D. Held ve A. McGrew (Der.), The Global Transformations Reader. Oxford: Polity Press. Henizs, W. J. 2005. The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review, 70: 871–897. Jackall, R. 1988. Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York: Oxford University Press. Kennedy, P. 1993. Preparing for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Random House. Kobrin, S. J. 1997. The Architecture of Globalization: State Sovereignty in a Networked Global Economy. J. H. Dunning (Der.), Governments, Globalization and International Business: 146–171. New York: Oxford University Press. Kogut, B. ve Macpherson, M. 2003. The Decision to Privatize as an Economic Policy Idea: Epistemic Communities, Palace Wars and Diffusion. International Diffusion of Political and Economic Liberalization Conference, October 3–4, Harvard University: Cambridge MA. Levine, R. ve Zervos, S. 1988. Stock Markets, Banks, and Economic Growth. American Economic Review, 88: 537-544 Levitt, T. 1983. The Globalization of Markets. Harvard Business Review, 61: 92-102. Lippi, A. 2000. One Theory, many practises. Institutional allomorphism in the managerialist reorganization of Italian governments. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 16: 455-477. Mander, J. ve Goldsmith E. 1996. The Case Against the Global Economy. San Frnacisco: Sirre Club Books. Marquis, C. ve Lounsbury M. 2007. Vive La Resistance:Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U. S. Community Banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 799-820. Muiller, F. 1994. Societal Effect, Organizational Effect and Globalization. Organization Studies, 15: 407–428. Naisbitt, J. ve Aburdene P. 1990. Megatrends 2000. New York: Morrow. Nelson, R. E. ve Gopalan, S. 2003. Do Organizational Cultures Replicate National Cultures? Isomorphism, Rejection and Reciprocal Opposition in the Corporate Values of Three Countries. Organization Studies, 24: 1114–1151. Ocasio, W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 187–206 Öniş, Z. 1999. Political economy of Turkey in the 1980’s: Anatomy of unorthodox liberalism. Z. Öniş (Der.), State and market: The political economy of Turkey in comparative perspective: 183–196. Dstanbul: Boğaziçi University Press. Öniş, Z. 2000. The Turkish Economy at the Turn of a New Century: Critical and Comparative Perspectives. M. Abramowitz (Der.), Turkey's Transformation and American Policy. Washington D.C.: The Century Foundation Press. Özen, Ş. ve Berkman, Ü. 2007. Cross-national Reconstruction of Managerial Practises: TQM in Turkey. Organization Studies, 28: 825–851. Palmer, D. A., Jennings, D. P. ve Zhou, X. 1993. Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large US corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 100-132. Pieterse, J. N. 1994. Globalization as hybridization. International Sociology, 9: 161–184. Polillo, S. ve Guillen, M.F. Globalization Pressures and the State: The Worldwide Spread of Central Bank Independence. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 17641802. Rodrik, D. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Saka, A. 2004. The Cross-National Diffusion of Work Systmes: Translation of Japanese Operations in the UK. Organization Studies, 25: 209-228. Sassen, S. 1996. Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press. Savran, S. 2008. Kod Adı Küreselleşme 21. Yüzyılda Emperyalizm. İstanbul: Yordam Kitap Basın ve Yayın Tic. Ltd. Şti. Schneiberg, M. 2008. Social Movements and Organizational Form: Cooperative Alternatives to Corporations in the American Insurance, Dairy and Grain Industries. American Sociological Review, 73: 635–667. Schneiberg, M. ve Lounsbury, M. 2008. Social Movements and Institutional Analysis. Sklair, L. 1991. Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press. Soysal, Y. 1994. Limits of Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sutton, J.R. ve Dobbin, F. 1996. The Two Faces of Governance: Responses to Legal Uncertanity in U.S. Firms, 1955 to 1985. American Sociological Review, 61: 794- 811. Strange, S. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Swank, D. 2003. Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: An assessment of a Conditional Diffusion Model of the Spread of Neoliberalism. International Diffusion of Political and Economic Liberalization Conference, October 3–4, Harvard University: Cambridge MA. Üsdiken, B. 2004. The French, The German and The American Higher Education for Business in Turkey, 1883–2003. New Perspectives on Turkey, 31: 5–38. Üsdiken, B. yayımda. Bir Örgütsel Alanın Yeniden Şekillenişi: Türkiye’de İş Hayatına Yönelik Yüksek Öğretimde Değişim, 1955–1975. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi. Vaira, M. 2004. Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 48: 483–510. Zajac, E. ve Westphal, J. 2004. The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions. American Sociology Review, 69: 433-458. Zeitlin, J. ve Herrigel, G. 2000. Americanization and its Limits: Reworking US Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wade, R. 1996. Globalization and Its Limits: Reports of the Death of the National Economy Are Greatly Exaggrerated. S. Berger ve R. Dore (Der.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism: 60–88. N.Y: Cornell University Press. Waters, M. 1995. Globalization. New York: Routledge.
 
Öğretim Yöntem ve Teknikleri:
Tartışma: Ders, her haftanın konusu ile ilgili verilen okuma parçalarının incelenmesi biçiminde yürütülecektir. Sınıf içi tartışmaların verimliliği açısından, ilgili okuma parçalarının dersten önce okunup gelinmesi gerekmektedir. Haftalık Okuma Raporu: Her hafta okunulan parça le ilgili 1 ya da 2 sayfalık bir rapor hazırlanacaktır. Öğrencilerden Akademik yazım geleneğine uyulması önemle beklenmektedir. Ders yükümlülükleri içine giren tüm raporlar alıntılama kurallarına uymalıdır. Bu derste öğrenciler ‘intihal’ kavramının ne anlama geldiğini öğrenmekle yükümlüdür.
 
Değerlendirme Sistemi:
YöntemAdetKatkı (%)
Aktiviteler1%30
Final Sınavı1%40
Sınıf Tartışmaları12%10
Final Projesi1%20
 
Ders İşbaşı Eğitimi (iş yerinde eğitim) Gerektiriyor mu?
Gerektirmiyor